<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 111 lacks clarity on seizing postal parcel imports, making redemption fines and penalties legally questionable.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29615</link>
    <description>Since the provisions of Section 111 do not specifically deal with seizure of goods imported through post parcel, therefore, imposition of redemption fine and penalty are not in conformity with the statutory provisions - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:57:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 111 lacks clarity on seizing postal parcel imports, making redemption fines and penalties legally questionable.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29615</link>
      <description>Since the provisions of Section 111 do not specifically deal with seizure of goods imported through post parcel, therefore, imposition of redemption fine and penalty are not in conformity with the statutory provisions - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:57:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>