<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 221 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328512</link>
    <description>The court upheld the requirement for the petitioner to deposit 20% of the tax demand during the appeal process, emphasizing the need to balance individual rights and state interests. The court directed the First Appellate Authority to promptly decide on the appeals within two months, allowing the petitioner to make the deposit during this period to ensure a fair and timely resolution of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 221 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328512</link>
      <description>The court upheld the requirement for the petitioner to deposit 20% of the tax demand during the appeal process, emphasizing the need to balance individual rights and state interests. The court directed the First Appellate Authority to promptly decide on the appeals within two months, allowing the petitioner to make the deposit during this period to ensure a fair and timely resolution of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>