https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328511 The Court held that the absence of rules under Section 102(2)(z) does not invalidate the exercise of power under Section 59(2) of the DVAT Act. It emphasized the need for proper guidelines in exercising powers to prevent misuse. The Court suggested the petitioner and others make representations to the Government for framing rules. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328511 The Court held that the absence of rules under Section 102(2)(z) does not invalidate the exercise of power under Section 59(2) of the DVAT Act. It emphasized the need for proper guidelines in exercising powers to prevent misuse. The Court suggested the petitioner and others make representations to the Government for framing rules. The writ petition and pending applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 26 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328511