<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328507</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the disallowance of Rs. 2,15,47,820/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized business expediency and the genuineness of transactions, aligning with favorable judicial precedents. The ITAT highlighted that the object of Section 40A(3) was to curb tax evasion, which was not applicable as transactions were verified and genuine. The consideration of provisions under Sections 144/145 of the Income Tax Act was briefly addressed, with the focus primarily on the Section 40A(3) disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328507</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reversing the disallowance of Rs. 2,15,47,820/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized business expediency and the genuineness of transactions, aligning with favorable judicial precedents. The ITAT highlighted that the object of Section 40A(3) was to curb tax evasion, which was not applicable as transactions were verified and genuine. The consideration of provisions under Sections 144/145 of the Income Tax Act was briefly addressed, with the focus primarily on the Section 40A(3) disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>