<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 212 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328503</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed time-barred under section 275(1)(a) and not applicable in cases of income estimation. The ITAT emphasized the independence of assessment and penalty proceedings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the decision based on the nature of income estimation involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 212 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328503</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was deemed time-barred under section 275(1)(a) and not applicable in cases of income estimation. The ITAT emphasized the independence of assessment and penalty proceedings, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the decision based on the nature of income estimation involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>