<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 202 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the need for proper identification of expenditure before disallowing under Section 14A and upheld the capitalization of interest on borrowed funds for business expansion. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A and interest on interest-free advances to related parties, citing sufficient interest-free funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 202 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the need for proper identification of expenditure before disallowing under Section 14A and upheld the capitalization of interest on borrowed funds for business expansion. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under Section 14A and interest on interest-free advances to related parties, citing sufficient interest-free funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>