<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 443 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183325</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow deduction towards the purchase value of iron and steel for the manufacture of finished goods and works contract was overturned. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling conflicted with a Division Bench judgment stating the materials were used for construction, not in original form as purchased. The Government&#039;s challenge regarding the change in character of the materials and execution of works contract was upheld, citing the Division Bench precedent. As a result, the revision petition was allowed in favor of the Government, rejecting the deduction claim by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 443 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183325</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow deduction towards the purchase value of iron and steel for the manufacture of finished goods and works contract was overturned. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling conflicted with a Division Bench judgment stating the materials were used for construction, not in original form as purchased. The Government&#039;s challenge regarding the change in character of the materials and execution of works contract was upheld, citing the Division Bench precedent. As a result, the revision petition was allowed in favor of the Government, rejecting the deduction claim by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>