<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328488</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for goods transportation between units. The judgment emphasized that even if the service tax payment was not mandatory, the appellant&#039;s payment entitled them to claim the credit. Referring to relevant case law, the Member concluded that the appellant was within their rights to claim the credit for the tax paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328488</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for goods transportation between units. The judgment emphasized that even if the service tax payment was not mandatory, the appellant&#039;s payment entitled them to claim the credit. Referring to relevant case law, the Member concluded that the appellant was within their rights to claim the credit for the tax paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>