https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3717 The applicant was held liable to pay service tax under section 65 (105) (zzzza) for the services provided in Proposed Activities No. 3 and No. 4, involving the construction of residential units within a housing complex. The Authority for Advance Rulings ruled that the applicant cannot avail simultaneous deductions under different tax schemes and must choose one method to discharge duty liability. Additionally, even if a sub-contractor pays the service tax, the applicant remains liable as the main service provider. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3717 The applicant was held liable to pay service tax under section 65 (105) (zzzza) for the services provided in Proposed Activities No. 3 and No. 4, involving the construction of residential units within a housing complex. The Authority for Advance Rulings ruled that the applicant cannot avail simultaneous deductions under different tax schemes and must choose one method to discharge duty liability. Additionally, even if a sub-contractor pays the service tax, the applicant remains liable as the main service provider. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3717