<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328484</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was available to the recipient where the input supplier cleared goods on payment of duty instead of claiming the exemption for clearances against invalidated advance licences. CESTAT followed its prior decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and held that the duty paid by the supplier remained creditable to the recipient, so the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 193 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328484</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was available to the recipient where the input supplier cleared goods on payment of duty instead of claiming the exemption for clearances against invalidated advance licences. CESTAT followed its prior decision in the appellant&#039;s own case and held that the duty paid by the supplier remained creditable to the recipient, so the Revenue&#039;s objection failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>