<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service Tax on Preferential Location Charges in Housing Projects Challenged: Section 65(101)(zzzh) Lacks Valuation Mechanism.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29603</link>
    <description>Legislative competence for Levy of service tax on preferential location charges while Purchasing a FLAT in the multi-storey group housing project - composite contract - Demand U/s 65(101)(zzzh) is not sustainable in the absence of valuation mechanism since no service can be levied on undivided share of land - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:54:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service Tax on Preferential Location Charges in Housing Projects Challenged: Section 65(101)(zzzh) Lacks Valuation Mechanism.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29603</link>
      <description>Legislative competence for Levy of service tax on preferential location charges while Purchasing a FLAT in the multi-storey group housing project - composite contract - Demand U/s 65(101)(zzzh) is not sustainable in the absence of valuation mechanism since no service can be levied on undivided share of land - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:54:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>