<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</link>
    <description>A special statute that exhaustively regulates dismissal and suspension does not permit a board to suspend its secretary unless that power is expressly provided. Sections 71 and 90 of the U.P. District Boards Act were construed strictly: section 71 required dismissal by special resolution subject to the appeal process, while section 90 covered only suspension as punishment or suspension in cases involving sanction by another authority. Because the dismissal here depended on an appeal, not prior sanction, the suspension resolution fell outside the statutory scheme. Section 16 of the U.P. General Clauses Act could not enlarge those powers, and the suspension was ultra vires and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 17:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</link>
      <description>A special statute that exhaustively regulates dismissal and suspension does not permit a board to suspend its secretary unless that power is expressly provided. Sections 71 and 90 of the U.P. District Boards Act were construed strictly: section 71 required dismissal by special resolution subject to the appeal process, while section 90 covered only suspension as punishment or suspension in cases involving sanction by another authority. Because the dismissal here depended on an appeal, not prior sanction, the suspension resolution fell outside the statutory scheme. Section 16 of the U.P. General Clauses Act could not enlarge those powers, and the suspension was ultra vires and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>