<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (10) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the suspension resolution passed by the District Board was ultra vires as it exceeded the statutory framework&#039;s scope. The Court restored the trial court&#039;s decree, affirming the suspension&#039;s illegality. The plaintiff had already received the awarded sum, with only appeal costs remaining. Each party was directed to bear its own costs, and the appeal was allowed, reinstating the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 17:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (10) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the suspension resolution passed by the District Board was ultra vires as it exceeded the statutory framework&#039;s scope. The Court restored the trial court&#039;s decree, affirming the suspension&#039;s illegality. The plaintiff had already received the awarded sum, with only appeal costs remaining. Each party was directed to bear its own costs, and the appeal was allowed, reinstating the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>