<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2502 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308</link>
    <description>Writ petitions were disposed of because an alternative statutory remedy was available. The court directed steps to fill vacancies in the Commercial Tax Appellate Tribunal and required expeditious disposal of the petitioners&#039; appeals. The interim order was directed to continue until those appeals were decided, preserving interim protection pending appellate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2502 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308</link>
      <description>Writ petitions were disposed of because an alternative statutory remedy was available. The court directed steps to fill vacancies in the Commercial Tax Appellate Tribunal and required expeditious disposal of the petitioners&#039; appeals. The interim order was directed to continue until those appeals were decided, preserving interim protection pending appellate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>