https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308 The Court disposed of the writ petitions challenging a seizure order and security demand under the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005, directing the State Government to address the non-functioning of the Commercial Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioners, engaged in courier services, argued against VAT liability for goods transported for personal use. Despite the absence of an alternative remedy through appeal, the Court emphasized the need for a functional Tribunal and ordered the State Government to rectify the situation within three months to facilitate timely resolution of appeals, maintaining the interim order during the process. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308 The Court disposed of the writ petitions challenging a seizure order and security demand under the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005, directing the State Government to address the non-functioning of the Commercial Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioners, engaged in courier services, argued against VAT liability for goods transported for personal use. Despite the absence of an alternative remedy through appeal, the Court emphasized the need for a functional Tribunal and ordered the State Government to rectify the situation within three months to facilitate timely resolution of appeals, maintaining the interim order during the process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183308