<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1119 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183309</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under Section 6 of the Uttarakhand VAT Act was unavailable for packing material used in finished goods transferred to out-of-State depots or godowns otherwise than by sale. Such stock transfers were distinct from inter-State sales, and packing material was not treated as raw material for the additional benefit claimed. A later Commissioner circular reflecting that interpretation displaced an earlier contrary circular. The proviso to Section 6(3), which granted an additional benefit for raw material used in manufacturing goods dispatched outside the State otherwise than by sale, operated as an incentive and did not discriminate against imported goods or restrict trade under Articles 301 and 304.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1119 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183309</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under Section 6 of the Uttarakhand VAT Act was unavailable for packing material used in finished goods transferred to out-of-State depots or godowns otherwise than by sale. Such stock transfers were distinct from inter-State sales, and packing material was not treated as raw material for the additional benefit claimed. A later Commissioner circular reflecting that interpretation displaced an earlier contrary circular. The proviso to Section 6(3), which granted an additional benefit for raw material used in manufacturing goods dispatched outside the State otherwise than by sale, operated as an incentive and did not discriminate against imported goods or restrict trade under Articles 301 and 304.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>