<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 191 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328482</link>
    <description>A passenger carrying undeclared gold as a carrier for consideration was treated as having violated the Customs declaration requirement, and the goods were found liable to confiscation. The statutory facility of redemption or re-export was held inapplicable because the goods were not bona fide baggage and the person was not the owner. Absolute confiscation was therefore restored, while the reduced penalty imposed at the appellate stage was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 191 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328482</link>
      <description>A passenger carrying undeclared gold as a carrier for consideration was treated as having violated the Customs declaration requirement, and the goods were found liable to confiscation. The statutory facility of redemption or re-export was held inapplicable because the goods were not bona fide baggage and the person was not the owner. Absolute confiscation was therefore restored, while the reduced penalty imposed at the appellate stage was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>