https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328478 Where an effective statutory appeal is available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained, particularly when the dispute involves mixed questions of fact and law. The challenge to the assessment order required examination of whether input tax credit was correctly availed on the items concerned, a matter better determined by the statutory appellate authorities. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the alternative appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2016 23:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328478 Where an effective statutory appeal is available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained, particularly when the dispute involves mixed questions of fact and law. The challenge to the assessment order required examination of whether input tax credit was correctly availed on the items concerned, a matter better determined by the statutory appellate authorities. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the alternative appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328478