https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328474 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision. It found the delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings unjustified and prejudicial to the respondent. The court also held that prior exoneration by the CBI and DRI barred further departmental proceedings. The Tribunal's jurisdiction was affirmed, and the timing of the charges was viewed as an attempt to obstruct the respondent's promotion. en-us Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328474 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision. It found the delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings unjustified and prejudicial to the respondent. The court also held that prior exoneration by the CBI and DRI barred further departmental proceedings. The Tribunal's jurisdiction was affirmed, and the timing of the charges was viewed as an attempt to obstruct the respondent's promotion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328474