<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing re-examination of the classification of rental income and penalty imposition. It upheld disallowances where the assessee failed to meet the evidentiary burden. The reopening of assessments was validated due to tangible material indicating income escapement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 179 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing re-examination of the classification of rental income and penalty imposition. It upheld disallowances where the assessee failed to meet the evidentiary burden. The reopening of assessments was validated due to tangible material indicating income escapement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>