<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328467</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning disallowances made by the AO and CIT(A) regarding payment to the husband for professional assistance, depreciation on car purchases, and ad-hoc disallowance of car expenses. The Tribunal found the payment to the husband justified due to his expertise and the substantial income earned by the assessee, directed the AO to allow depreciation claimed on a car, and reduced the disallowance on car expenses for personal use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328467</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, overturning disallowances made by the AO and CIT(A) regarding payment to the husband for professional assistance, depreciation on car purchases, and ad-hoc disallowance of car expenses. The Tribunal found the payment to the husband justified due to his expertise and the substantial income earned by the assessee, directed the AO to allow depreciation claimed on a car, and reduced the disallowance on car expenses for personal use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>