<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that annulled the reopening of the assessment. The reassessment was deemed invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without fresh tangible material. The role of audit objections was scrutinized, highlighting they cannot solely justify reopening without the AO&#039;s independent assessment. The Tribunal did not address the addition&#039;s merits due to the invalid reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order that annulled the reopening of the assessment. The reassessment was deemed invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without fresh tangible material. The role of audit objections was scrutinized, highlighting they cannot solely justify reopening without the AO&#039;s independent assessment. The Tribunal did not address the addition&#039;s merits due to the invalid reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>