<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee company for the assessment year 2008-09, deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure amounting to Rs. 22,23,298. The Tribunal found that the funds were not diverted for non-business purposes, considering the availability of interest-free funds and substantial interest income earned. The Tribunal concluded that no addition or disallowance was warranted, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 168 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee company for the assessment year 2008-09, deleting the disallowance of interest expenditure amounting to Rs. 22,23,298. The Tribunal found that the funds were not diverted for non-business purposes, considering the availability of interest-free funds and substantial interest income earned. The Tribunal concluded that no addition or disallowance was warranted, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>