<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, focusing on the denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction for interest income, considering it as income from the business of banking. The issues regarding the provision for Gratuity Fund and alleged stock valuation were not extensively discussed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, focusing on the denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction for interest income, considering it as income from the business of banking. The issues regarding the provision for Gratuity Fund and alleged stock valuation were not extensively discussed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>