<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for further investigation regarding the 12 parties identified by the Investigation Wing and two additional parties. The AO is directed to conduct thorough inquiries, including examining the concerned parties and allowing the assessee to cross-examine them if necessary. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for the remaining 30 parties due to lack of adverse information and sufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:16:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for further investigation regarding the 12 parties identified by the Investigation Wing and two additional parties. The AO is directed to conduct thorough inquiries, including examining the concerned parties and allowing the assessee to cross-examine them if necessary. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition for the remaining 30 parties due to lack of adverse information and sufficient evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>