https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183303 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC is limited and can disturb an acquittal only in exceptional cases of manifest illegality, glaring procedural defect, or gross miscarriage of justice. The High Court could not reappreciate prosecution evidence, reject the trial court's assessment of medical evidence, and remand the matter in a way that effectively compelled conviction, because no perversity, inadmissible material, or legal error in the acquittal was shown. The order was therefore unsustainable, the impugned remand was set aside, and the trial court's acquittal remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:26:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183303 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC is limited and can disturb an acquittal only in exceptional cases of manifest illegality, glaring procedural defect, or gross miscarriage of justice. The High Court could not reappreciate prosecution evidence, reject the trial court's assessment of medical evidence, and remand the matter in a way that effectively compelled conviction, because no perversity, inadmissible material, or legal error in the acquittal was shown. The order was therefore unsustainable, the impugned remand was set aside, and the trial court's acquittal remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183303