https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183301 Revisional jurisdiction is supervisory and cannot be used as a second appeal to re-appreciate evidence after the trial court and appellate court have concurrently assessed the record, unless a glaring error or manifest miscarriage of justice is shown. Where the High Court re-weighed oral evidence and ignored material evidence, its interference with the conviction was beyond revisionary power and unsustainable. On that basis, the conviction and sentence affirmed below were restored, and the findings of the courts below remained undisturbed. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183301 Revisional jurisdiction is supervisory and cannot be used as a second appeal to re-appreciate evidence after the trial court and appellate court have concurrently assessed the record, unless a glaring error or manifest miscarriage of justice is shown. Where the High Court re-weighed oral evidence and ignored material evidence, its interference with the conviction was beyond revisionary power and unsustainable. On that basis, the conviction and sentence affirmed below were restored, and the findings of the courts below remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183301