<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1025 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183284</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The case was referenced by the High Court, Madras. Petitioner represented by multiple individuals and respondent by Radha Rangaswamy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:19:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1025 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183284</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed the case after condoning the delay. The case was referenced by the High Court, Madras. Petitioner represented by multiple individuals and respondent by Radha Rangaswamy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>