https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328448 The High Court upheld the order by CESTAT, finding no error in setting aside penalties and redemption fines imposed on the Respondents for excess stock of copper rods and ingots. The Court held that Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules requires consideration of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act before imposing penalties, which was not done in this case. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for determination. en-us Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328448 The High Court upheld the order by CESTAT, finding no error in setting aside penalties and redemption fines imposed on the Respondents for excess stock of copper rods and ingots. The Court held that Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules requires consideration of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act before imposing penalties, which was not done in this case. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for determination. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328448