<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim, ruling that it was not barred by limitation as it was filed within the statutory period. The case found no unjust enrichment as the duty payment was not recoverable from any other entity. Additionally, interest was granted to the respondent in accordance with the law. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim, ruling that it was not barred by limitation as it was filed within the statutory period. The case found no unjust enrichment as the duty payment was not recoverable from any other entity. Additionally, interest was granted to the respondent in accordance with the law. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>