https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328438 The Tribunal rejected the Review of Order (ROM) application as it was filed after the prescribed time limit of six months from the date of the Final Order, in accordance with Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal relied on a decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court and concluded that applications filed beyond the statutory time limit are not maintainable, leading to the rejection of the ROM application in this case. en-us Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328438 The Tribunal rejected the Review of Order (ROM) application as it was filed after the prescribed time limit of six months from the date of the Final Order, in accordance with Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal relied on a decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court and concluded that applications filed beyond the statutory time limit are not maintainable, leading to the rejection of the ROM application in this case. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328438