<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 142 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328433</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed for not carrying the declaration form ST-18A for directly imported goods from Singapore for personal use, distinguishing between goods imported from foreign countries and those brought in from other states. The Court found no substantial legal issue and dismissed the petition, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case and the lack of justification for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 13:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 142 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328433</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed for not carrying the declaration form ST-18A for directly imported goods from Singapore for personal use, distinguishing between goods imported from foreign countries and those brought in from other states. The Court found no substantial legal issue and dismissed the petition, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case and the lack of justification for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>