https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183279 The appeal involved challenges against the deletion of additions towards capital introduced by partners and advances under section 68 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions without presenting evidence to the assessing officer. The issues were remanded back to the assessing officer for fresh consideration based on the evidence provided by the assessee before the CIT(A). The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 7.1.2011. en-us Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jun 2016 13:15:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183279 The appeal involved challenges against the deletion of additions towards capital introduced by partners and advances under section 68 of the IT Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions without presenting evidence to the assessing officer. The issues were remanded back to the assessing officer for fresh consideration based on the evidence provided by the assessee before the CIT(A). The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 7.1.2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183279