<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 938 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183277</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, emphasizing the importance of proper allocation of expenditure, treatment of received amounts as business income, and the reasonableness of income estimation based on unreliable accounts. The appeals for the years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995-96 were dismissed accordingly, with no substantial question of law involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 22:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 938 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183277</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, emphasizing the importance of proper allocation of expenditure, treatment of received amounts as business income, and the reasonableness of income estimation based on unreliable accounts. The appeals for the years 1993-94, 1994-95, and 1995-96 were dismissed accordingly, with no substantial question of law involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>