<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 132 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition under Section 68 and accept the LTCG income as exempt under Section 10(38). The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s addition was based on presumptions without proper investigation, while the assessee provided substantial evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 132 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition under Section 68 and accept the LTCG income as exempt under Section 10(38). The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s addition was based on presumptions without proper investigation, while the assessee provided substantial evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>