<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds, affirming that service tax should not be included in the gross receipts for the purpose of Section 44BB. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was remanded to the AO for reassessment based on the revised gross receipts. The appeal of the Department was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the exclusion of service tax from gross receipts under Section 44BB, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in Mitchell Drilling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds, affirming that service tax should not be included in the gross receipts for the purpose of Section 44BB. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was remanded to the AO for reassessment based on the revised gross receipts. The appeal of the Department was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the exclusion of service tax from gross receipts under Section 44BB, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in Mitchell Drilling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>