<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 120 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328411</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, dismissing the challenge against the reopening of assessment under section 147 as it became academic. The Tribunal upheld the claim of deduction under section 10B before setting off unabsorbed depreciation/losses, emphasizing that the deduction should be computed before adjusting brought forward losses/depreciation. The decision was based on the interpretation of post-April 2001 provisions and supported by various High Court judgments. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the deduction accordingly, giving precedence to the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 120 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328411</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, dismissing the challenge against the reopening of assessment under section 147 as it became academic. The Tribunal upheld the claim of deduction under section 10B before setting off unabsorbed depreciation/losses, emphasizing that the deduction should be computed before adjusting brought forward losses/depreciation. The decision was based on the interpretation of post-April 2001 provisions and supported by various High Court judgments. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the deduction accordingly, giving precedence to the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>