<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to the lack of valid service of notice u/s 148. Relying on the precedent set by the Delhi High Court, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper service of notice as a jurisdictional requirement. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the reassessment proceedings invalid, while dismissing other grounds as inconsequential. The decision was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to the lack of valid service of notice u/s 148. Relying on the precedent set by the Delhi High Court, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper service of notice as a jurisdictional requirement. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, declaring the reassessment proceedings invalid, while dismissing other grounds as inconsequential. The decision was pronounced on 27th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>