<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 109 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328400</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no concealment of income, only a disbelieved explanation. The Tribunal upheld the findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that there was no substantial question of law to interfere with the order, leading to the negation of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on the assessed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:09:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 109 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328400</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no concealment of income, only a disbelieved explanation. The Tribunal upheld the findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that there was no substantial question of law to interfere with the order, leading to the negation of the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on the assessed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>