<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328398</link>
    <description>The Commissioner revised the assessment order to add income based on TDS certificates, leading to a challenge before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal recognized the cash system of accounting followed by the assessee and deleted the addition for double taxation. It upheld the decision that TDS certificates alone were not conclusive evidence of assessable income and allowed credit for TDS only on income offered for tax in the relevant year. The Tribunal found no perversity in its decision, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 107 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328398</link>
      <description>The Commissioner revised the assessment order to add income based on TDS certificates, leading to a challenge before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal recognized the cash system of accounting followed by the assessee and deleted the addition for double taxation. It upheld the decision that TDS certificates alone were not conclusive evidence of assessable income and allowed credit for TDS only on income offered for tax in the relevant year. The Tribunal found no perversity in its decision, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>