<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 664 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183268</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A) order, directing the assessing officer to estimate income at 8% on main contract receipts and 5% on sub-contract receipts, while reducing departmental recoveries from gross receipts. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT (A)&#039;s application of sec. 145 of the IT Act and the levy of interest under sec. 234B, providing specific guidelines for income estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:50:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 664 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183268</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A) order, directing the assessing officer to estimate income at 8% on main contract receipts and 5% on sub-contract receipts, while reducing departmental recoveries from gross receipts. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT (A)&#039;s application of sec. 145 of the IT Act and the levy of interest under sec. 234B, providing specific guidelines for income estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>