<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1022 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183261</link>
    <description>Payment for an off-the-shelf software copy supplied under a limited licence was not royalty because no copyright rights were transferred. The recipient could only use the software as a copyrighted article and was barred from copying, modifying, reverse engineering, sublicensing, or commercially exploiting it. On that footing, the amount was treated as consideration for purchase of a copyrighted article, not for use of, or right to use, copyright, so no tax was deductible at source under section 195. The foreign recipient&#039;s income was characterised as business income, and absent a permanent establishment in India, it was not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1022 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183261</link>
      <description>Payment for an off-the-shelf software copy supplied under a limited licence was not royalty because no copyright rights were transferred. The recipient could only use the software as a copyrighted article and was barred from copying, modifying, reverse engineering, sublicensing, or commercially exploiting it. On that footing, the amount was treated as consideration for purchase of a copyrighted article, not for use of, or right to use, copyright, so no tax was deductible at source under section 195. The foreign recipient&#039;s income was characterised as business income, and absent a permanent establishment in India, it was not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>