<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (5) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183255</link>
    <description>For estate duty valuation of tenanted property, the principal value must reflect the open-market price subject to the legal restrictions affecting the premises. Where rent control law governs the building, the landlord cannot assume a notional higher rent or a speculative market divorced from statutory ceilings and tenancy incidents; controlled fair rent is the proper basis for assessing what a willing buyer would pay. On those facts, the land-and-building method was treated as unsuitable because the property was tenanted and income was statutorily regulated, and the Tribunal&#039;s rental valuation was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (5) TMI 70 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183255</link>
      <description>For estate duty valuation of tenanted property, the principal value must reflect the open-market price subject to the legal restrictions affecting the premises. Where rent control law governs the building, the landlord cannot assume a notional higher rent or a speculative market divorced from statutory ceilings and tenancy incidents; controlled fair rent is the proper basis for assessing what a willing buyer would pay. On those facts, the land-and-building method was treated as unsuitable because the property was tenanted and income was statutorily regulated, and the Tribunal&#039;s rental valuation was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>