https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183251 The Supreme Court held that the assignment of a registered decree related to immovable property, despite the restraint order, was void as it fell within the order's scope. The assignees were not permitted to be impleaded as parties, and the lower courts' decisions were overturned. The Court directed the trial court to expedite the finalization of the suit before the summer vacation of 1996, with the High Court of Punjab and Haryana monitoring the progress. The appeal was allowed with costs, and no further orders were deemed necessary in related petitions. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:47:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183251 The Supreme Court held that the assignment of a registered decree related to immovable property, despite the restraint order, was void as it fell within the order's scope. The assignees were not permitted to be impleaded as parties, and the lower courts' decisions were overturned. The Court directed the trial court to expedite the finalization of the suit before the summer vacation of 1996, with the High Court of Punjab and Haryana monitoring the progress. The appeal was allowed with costs, and no further orders were deemed necessary in related petitions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183251