<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 173 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3690</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, the Shri Jagannath Temple Managing Committee, in a case involving the withdrawal of income tax exemption under section 10(23BBA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the withdrawal of the exemption without a prior hearing violated natural justice and quashed the order. Additionally, the court deemed post-decisional hearing as inadequate, clarified that bodies with unconditional income tax exemption under section 10 are not required to file returns, and emphasized that no tax deduction at source should be made from the petitioner&#039;s income. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 173 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3690</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, the Shri Jagannath Temple Managing Committee, in a case involving the withdrawal of income tax exemption under section 10(23BBA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the withdrawal of the exemption without a prior hearing violated natural justice and quashed the order. Additionally, the court deemed post-decisional hearing as inadequate, clarified that bodies with unconditional income tax exemption under section 10 are not required to file returns, and emphasized that no tax deduction at source should be made from the petitioner&#039;s income. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>