<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 93 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328384</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excise duty under section 43B for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT emphasized the importance of demand notices in determining liability accrual and cited legal precedents supporting deduction of statutory liabilities in the payment year. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the absence of contrary binding decisions and the precedent set in the appellant&#039;s case for A.Y. 2008-09, affirming the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 93 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328384</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excise duty under section 43B for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT emphasized the importance of demand notices in determining liability accrual and cited legal precedents supporting deduction of statutory liabilities in the payment year. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the absence of contrary binding decisions and the precedent set in the appellant&#039;s case for A.Y. 2008-09, affirming the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>