<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328374</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the assessment order due to lack of jurisdiction under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, as the satisfaction note was recorded by the Assessing Officer of the assessee, not meeting the statutory requirements. The appeal challenging the legality and jurisdiction of the notice issued under section 153C and subsequent assessment order was allowed, with the order pronounced on 10th May 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328374</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the assessment order due to lack of jurisdiction under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, as the satisfaction note was recorded by the Assessing Officer of the assessee, not meeting the statutory requirements. The appeal challenging the legality and jurisdiction of the notice issued under section 153C and subsequent assessment order was allowed, with the order pronounced on 10th May 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>