<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 81 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of Directors&#039; foreign travel expenditure due to insufficient evidence supporting business purposes. However, the Tribunal directed the deletion of disallowance of finance charges under section 40(a)(ia) as the payments were made within the same financial year, following the precedent set in the Merilyn Shipping case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 81 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of Directors&#039; foreign travel expenditure due to insufficient evidence supporting business purposes. However, the Tribunal directed the deletion of disallowance of finance charges under section 40(a)(ia) as the payments were made within the same financial year, following the precedent set in the Merilyn Shipping case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>