<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 80 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling the reopening of assessment invalid under section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reassessment was annulled as a mere change of opinion, with expenses related to job work payments already examined in the original assessment. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was also deemed unnecessary due to the invalid reopening. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was issued on 06-05-2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 15:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 80 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling the reopening of assessment invalid under section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The reassessment was annulled as a mere change of opinion, with expenses related to job work payments already examined in the original assessment. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was also deemed unnecessary due to the invalid reopening. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was issued on 06-05-2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>