https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183248 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the suspension order of the Cashier at the Agricultural Market Committee, emphasizing the authority's power to suspend multiple times in cases of serious financial misconduct. The Court justified the delay in disciplinary proceedings due to the complexity of the embezzlement case and stressed the importance of allowing investigations to proceed diligently. The High Court's interference in revoking the suspension orders was overturned, with the Supreme Court highlighting the need for courts to refrain from intervening unless there is clear evidence of malice or lack of prima facie evidence. en-us Mon, 29 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183248 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the suspension order of the Cashier at the Agricultural Market Committee, emphasizing the authority's power to suspend multiple times in cases of serious financial misconduct. The Court justified the delay in disciplinary proceedings due to the complexity of the embezzlement case and stressed the importance of allowing investigations to proceed diligently. The High Court's interference in revoking the suspension orders was overturned, with the Supreme Court highlighting the need for courts to refrain from intervening unless there is clear evidence of malice or lack of prima facie evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183248