<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 107 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3687</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s remand to the Commissioner (Appeals), finding the remand justified because the Commissioner (Appeals) had not properly considered the factual matrix despite having allowed exemption under s.10(22) for a prior assessment year. The court held that principles of res judicata are not applicable in income-tax proceedings and therefore the Tribunal acted correctly in ordering reconsideration of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 107 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3687</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s remand to the Commissioner (Appeals), finding the remand justified because the Commissioner (Appeals) had not properly considered the factual matrix despite having allowed exemption under s.10(22) for a prior assessment year. The court held that principles of res judicata are not applicable in income-tax proceedings and therefore the Tribunal acted correctly in ordering reconsideration of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>