<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183244</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal regarding the reversion of two appellants from Upper Division Clerks to Lower Division Clerks, quashing the orders of reduction in rank. However, no monetary compensation was granted for the period spent in the lower posts. The appeal of the third appellant, initially a Lower Division Clerk reverted to that post from Auditor, was dismissed as the reversion was deemed an appropriate punishment without merit for appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 222 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183244</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal regarding the reversion of two appellants from Upper Division Clerks to Lower Division Clerks, quashing the orders of reduction in rank. However, no monetary compensation was granted for the period spent in the lower posts. The appeal of the third appellant, initially a Lower Division Clerk reverted to that post from Auditor, was dismissed as the reversion was deemed an appropriate punishment without merit for appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>